Tasks 4-6 Forensics

Problem No. 4
On the night of July 10-11, a Renault car worth 400 thousand rubles was stolen from the garage of the guarded garage cooperative "Avtomobilist-1", located in SibNIISKHOZ in Omsk. The car belongs to Pustynnikov, who purchased it on July 10 and put it in the garage for the first time.
Problem 4. The territory of the garage cooperative is surrounded by a wooden fence. On the left side of the garage cooperative there is a dacha community, across the road there is a construction site, on the right there is a vacant lot.
Penetration into the garage was carried out by digging and then opening the gate from the inside.
Determine the boundaries of the inspection of the crime scene and the composition of the investigative team. Name the traces that can be found during an inspection of the crime scene in this case.

Problem No. 5
In a criminal case on the fact of apartment theft, he was interrogated as a victim, who told the investigator, among other things, that the following were stolen from the apartment: a SONY laptop, a SAMSUNG microwave oven, a PANASONIC LCD TV, a NOKIA 6600 cell phone ", men´s mink coat, men´s mink hat, winter shoes "MAKLINIT", as well as food products. Considering that video recording was being conducted in the apartment, Semenov provided the investigator with a copy of the video recording, which recorded the person committing the crime in question, who, according to Semenov, is his neighbor Ilyin, who lives on the floor below.
During an inspection of the crime scene in Semenov’s apartment, fingerprints that did not belong to Semenov were found and seized on the kitchen doorknob, as well as on the refrigerator handle. In the materials of the criminal case there is a conclusion of a forensic fingerprint examination, the conclusions of which indicate that these fingerprints belong to Ilyin, who was previously convicted of burglary.
What tactical techniques can be used by the investigator when interrogating Ilyin as a suspect? Formulate the questions and determine in what logical sequence they should be asked to the suspect?

Problem No. 6
A minor, Lesnikov, and an adult, Volkov, were detained in a criminal case involving a series of thefts of non-ferrous metals from country houses. During interrogation as a suspect, the minor Lesnikov confessed that he and Volkov had committed thefts from country houses and handed over the stolen property to metal collection points. The funds obtained from criminal activities were divided equally. In turn, the suspect Volkov completely denied committing thefts from country houses by a group of people in a preliminary conspiracy with the minor Lesnikov. The investigator decided to conduct a confrontation between the suspects.
Is it permissible to conduct a confrontation between a minor Lesnikov and an adult Volkov? What circumstances should the investigator take into account? What tactical techniques can an investigator use when conducting a confrontation between a minor Lesnikov and Volkov?